只有人類失去愛時,才會訴諸於控制

沒有愛,人們將無法導領一切。只能束諸控制來滿足,但那必需要有更多、更大的籌碼。


       「控制」是人們在二元情境中,為達到優勢的一種伎倆。當人們在兩極之中運作,控制是他們用來獲取勝利的方法。更糟的是,在控制被建立之後,為了使那勝利情境永久存在,兩極會被維持著。事實上,當人們進行大量的交換時,他們在經濟上更健全。我喜歡看到人們積極的交換貨物與服務;當經濟流動時,就不會被架構控制。當人們互益交換時,將沒有人會挨餓,失業,而好的點子也將不會被埋沒。

Control is a ploy for achieving dominance within a dualistic situation. When people are operating within polarities, control is what they use to obtain a winning position. What makes it even worse is that after control is established, the polarities will be maintained in order to perpetuate the winning position. When economies are fluid, structures have trouble dominating. When people exchange freely, no one goes hungry, no one goes unemployed, and no worthy idea goes unproduced.

        沒有愛,人們將無法導領一切。只能束諸控制來滿足,但那必需要有更多、更大的籌碼。那些生活中道的人,將形成新地球經濟的基礎,而因此繼承地球;我並非不贊同你的觀點,因為理論上它聽起來非常好,但為什麼貪婪的人似乎遙遙領先,而中道的人居焉在後?

Without love, a man has lost all basis for command. The best he can hope for is control, but that requires leverage lots of it! Those who live in moderation, will form the basis of the new earth economy, and thus inherit the earth. I’m not disagreeing with you, for it sounds great in principle, but why is it that greedy people seem to get ahead, and moderate people are held back?